The MVP mistake: Neglecting continuous improvement
In the fast-paced world of product development, the Minimum Viable Valuable Product (MVP) concept has become a staple. It promises rapid delivery of a functional product version, allowing organisations to gather early user feedback and iterate accordingly.
However, the misuse of MVP by some organisations can lead to a troubling phenomenon—delivering product features without dedicating sufficient resources and attention to monitoring performance and making optimisations post-launch. This article delves into the consequences of this misuse and highlights the importance of embracing continuous improvement.
The MVP Misconception
The essence of an MVP lies in its simplicity: to create a version of a product that includes only the most essential features required for it to function and provide value to users. Unfortunately, some organisations occasionally employ the term MVP as a convenient excuse to release half-baked products and meet deadlines. While ostensibly aligned with the principles of rapid development, this practice can harm product quality, user satisfaction and brand perception.
The Unseen Consequences
Stagnation: Releasing an MVP and neglecting to monitor its performance can lead to stagnation. The initial version may solve a particular problem, but as user needs evolve and competitors introduce new features, the product can quickly become outdated and less competitive.
User Dissatisfaction: Users are crucial sources of feedback, and their satisfaction is vital for the success of any product. If an MVP is released without subsequent improvements, users might encounter unaddressed issues, leading to frustration and potentially driving them away to competitor offerings.
Missed Opportunities: Without continuous monitoring and improvement, organisations can miss opportunities to discover hidden potential within their products. Valuable insights, which could have been derived from analysing user behaviour and feedback, are lost when organisations do not actively engage with their user base.
Reputation Damage: In the age of social media and online reviews, negative feedback can spread like wildfire. An underwhelming MVP release that fails to evolve can damage an organisation's reputation, making it harder to regain users' trust.
Embracing Continuous Improvement
Data-Driven Decision Making: Organisations must invest in data collection and analysis tools that help them gather insights on user behaviour, feature usage, and pain points. These insights can guide decisions for future iterations, ensuring that the product aligns with user needs.
Iterative Development: The MVP should be viewed as the starting point, not the endpoint. An iterative product development approach uses the initial release as a foundation for ongoing enhancements based on feedback, analytics, and changing market dynamics.
Prioritisation: Not all feedback and requests are equal. Prioritise improvements based on user impact and strategic alignment. This prevents the product team from becoming overwhelmed and ensures that efforts are focused on the most valuable changes.
Engagement and Communication: Open communication channels with users can foster community and ownership. Regularly update users on product enhancements, acknowledging their feedback and showing that their input matters.
Resource Allocation: Allocate sufficient resources for post-launch activities. This includes having a dedicated team responsible for monitoring performance and making improvements and a well-defined roadmap for future releases.
Examples of Successful MVPs
Dropbox: Dropbox's MVP was a simple video demonstrating the concept of easy file sharing and synchronization across devices. This video helped them gauge interest and gather sign-ups before even developing the product.
Instagram: Instagram's MVP was initially a photo-sharing app called Burbn. The team noticed that users were primarily interested in the photo-sharing aspect. They pivoted and focused on refining the photo-sharing experience, leading to the immensely successful Instagram app.
Airbnb: The founders of Airbnb started with a simple MVP—a website to help people find a place to stay during conferences when hotels were fully booked. The positive response encouraged them to expand their platform and include other people's properties.
Zappos: Zappos started as an MVP that tested the idea of selling shoes online. The founder would visit local shoe stores, take pictures of the shoes, and post them on the website.
Uber: Uber's initial MVP was a basic app that allowed users to request a black car service from their smartphones. The founders tested the concept by offering the service in a limited area.
Conclusion
The concept of the Minimum Valuable Product is a powerful tool for rapidly delivering value through functional products and gaining early user feedback. However, by using the MVP label to justify the premature launch of a product with subpar or partially functional features, these organisations risk alienating their user base and tarnishing their reputation. In such cases, the true spirit of the MVP gets overshadowed by the rush to meet arbitrary timelines.
Organisations must recognise that an MVP isn't a shield against substandard experiences but signifies the beginning of continuous improvement and iterative development. They should leverage data, feedback, and iteration to craft products that adapt to user needs and stay competitive. Pragmagic designers are pivotal in this journey, steering organisations toward iterative excellence and sustainable growth.
Are you struggling to add value to your MVP?
Schedule a call with our co-founders to receive expert advice on your existing brand or product.
Present your idea, product or challenge.
Collaborative discussion to consider all aspects of your request.
Design-led advice based on experience and expertise.
Get a list of pragmatic actions.
Fee: £250* (€290)
-
Once purchased, you will receive an e-mail with a short questionnaire and a link to book your appointment. If you have any questions, write to us at hi@atlantti.co
-
Please allow for 48h notice as you will be asked to provide some information about your product before the consultation.
(*) The consultation fee will be included in the project cost if you choose to work with us.
